by "The Real A"

March 15, 1999 - #77

Do you know how hard it is, dear readers, to come up with the first sentence of this here column? Week in and week out I must always come up with the first sentence of this here column. If only I could start with the second sentence of this here column, wouldn't that make life a lot easier? I could then write the first sentence whenever I felt like it. In fact, I could write the first sentence right here and who would be the wiser? Frankly, I'm just bored of writing the first sentence first. Writing the first sentence first is just so obvious. I want to break tradition, although then I'd be left with a broken tradition and what good would that be? I'd have to have the tradition mended or put a Band-Aid on it or just throw it in the trash and then where would we be? And would where we would be be better than where we are now? These are existential questions, dear readers, and I, for one, say phooey on existential questions. We simply cannot have existential questions in this here column. I feel we can exist without existential questions and to prove my point (no mean feat) what is "existential" but "exist" with an "ential" added on for no reason whatsoever? Does anyone know what the hell I'm talking about? I certainly don't.

Thank goodness (thank you, goodness) we are past the first sentence and the first paragraph. I feel we will be much more lucid and coherent in the second paragraph. I don't know why I feel this, but I do. And yet, a mere perusal of the second paragraph as it exists (not existential) would seem to prove me wrong. Oh, enough of this idle meandering banter (retnab spelled backwards). Do you know that every time I type a word backwards my handy-dandy computer has to let me know that I've misspelled it? Like I didn't know that? Computers are so literal, are they not? Or is that an existential question? Anyway, I am back from New York and I have been fighting jet lag. I got in a few good punches, but frankly jet lag is winning. Jet lag gave me a swift uppercut to the jaw and I've been feeling the after-effects of said uppercut ever since I returned. I had a swell time in New York, though. As you all must know by now, I ate all my meals at Joe Allen. And they were scrumptious, as always. They had my beloved coconut custard pie (with whipped cream) so I was happily contented. But do you know what invariably happens, dear readers? Other diners see me eating my beloved coconut custard pie (with whipped cream) and they feel strangely compelled to order it themselves. You don't believe me? Well, I can prove it, dear readers, because I took an activity picture of a diner who did precisely what I'm talking about. And I caught him in the act of eating it, with whipped cream clearly visible on or about his hungry maw.

You see? That bad boy Brent Barrett (current star of Chicago on Broadway) saw me eating my beloved coconut custard pie (with whipped cream) and he copied me, and the irrefutable proof is here for all to see. I was supposed to see Annie Get Your Gun at the Saturday matinee, and I had choice house seats to do so, but they were taken away from me at the last minute and given to a member of the press. Yes, you heard it here, dear readers, they gave my house seats to a member of the press. That is simply heinous (heinous, do you hear me?). Who the hell does that member of the press think he or she is? So, I was left out in the cold, dear readers. Here is an activity picture which I took while I was out in the cold. It is of the Marriot Marquis marquee (or should it be the Marriot Marquee marquis?), which just happens to be advertising the show I was supposed to see but didn't because some buttcheek usurped my seats.

By the way, that is me behind the camera. Don't I look like I was out in the cold? I did see a new musical entitled Bright Lights, Big City which I will write about in a section which I shall call Bright Lights, Big City. I also bought some hard-to-find cds at the best cd store in all of New York. Actually, it is my favorite cd store anywhere. It is called Footlight Records and it is located in the Greenwich Village. They have a wonderful selection, and even though they are a bit pricier than Tower or Virgin, I give them my business anyway. Here is an activity photo of Footlight Records, with one of its owners (Richard) in an unrehearsed pose.

You can find cds of almost any show, soundtrack or singer at Footlight Records, including some very obscure recordings of shows written by my close personal friend, Mr. Stephen Sondheim. Why, I believe they even have a Spanish version of Sweeney Todd, which just happens to be called Sweeney Todd. I myself have purchased a Japanese language recording of A Chorus Line. You haven't lived until you've heard Dance: Ten, Looks: Three in Japanese. I also have a Swedish version of Sweet Charity and a German version of Annie. I was hoping for a Latvian version of Passion but so far there hasn't been a Latvian version of Passion, but let me tell you those darned Latt's could use some Passion.

I feel this whole column has an existential feel to it. I don't know why, I just do. Well, perhaps I'd just better move on to the next section of the column, because frankly this whole column thus far is starting to feel like the revival of Night Must Fall: Pointless. But enough about me.

Bright Lights, Big City

The first question (not existential) we have to ask is why I went to see this show. I disliked the movie, am sure I would have disliked the novel, and had read a couple of the scathing reviews the show had gotten. I hate drugs or even the thought of drugs, and I find it difficult to care about characters that are on the fast track to oblivion. Yes, the leading character finally realizes he is doing himself harm, but by the time he does I simply couldn't care less. However, I was invited to see it so see it I did.

It is obvious from the time you enter the theater that the producers and creative team all thought they had another Rent on their hands. After all, it's playing in the same theater where Rent began, and it has the same director and the same set designer as well. Now, keep in mind that Rent held very few pleasures for me, but Rent had a structure that was sound and a score obviously written by someone with talent. Bright Lights, Big City was written by a fellow named Paul Scott Goodman. He not only wrote the score but the "book" as well. He is also in the show, playing someone named Paul Scott Goodman. This is a curious device, to say the least. Mr. Goodman is a long-haired forty-ish "rocker" with a thick almost incomprehensible Scottish accent. He comes out at the beginning of the show with his guitar and informs the audience that he's Paul Scott Goodman and that he wrote the show we're about to see. He then serves as a kind of narrator throughout the show. The big problem with this is that one simply can't understand about half of what he's either saying or singing. I don't think this "author serving as narrator" is a good idea for the musical theater. Why, can you imagine if Stephen Sondheim came out at the beginning of Passion and said, "Hi, I'm Steve Sondheim and I wrote this show" and then proceeded to walk up to the naked Clara and Giorgio and start singing about what we're going to see? In any case, Mr. Goodman's music is servicable but all sounds the same. His lyrics, on the other hand, are inept beyond repair. There is a lot of loud singing in the show, some of it by reasonably talented people. And Patrick Wilson gives his all in the central role of Jamie, but, again, I simply didn't care about him. That said, there were ten or eleven people in the full house who were hooping and hollering and trying to turn the evening into a Rent experience, but the rest of us weren't having any of it. Several people departed at intermission, although I toughed it out until the very end. My prediction is that when Bright Lights, Big City ends its run, that will basically be the end of the show. This has become the single most astonishing thing to me about the current state of the musical theater, the things authors are choosing to musicalize. So unappealing, so unappetizing. I'm telling you here and now and also now and here that the first people who write a truly entertaining old-fashioned musical with a tuneful score are going to have a huge hit. Mark my words, dear readers. Or, perhaps Mr. Mark Bakalor can mark my words, since he is indeed Mark.

Didn't he do a fine job of marking my words? In fact, I venture to say there is no finer marker of words than the marker Mark.

Cabaret Redux

Well, dear readers, the Los Angeles critics have shown their complete incompetentcy once again. They were vicious and horrible to leading lady Teri Hatcher. They should be taken out and drawn and quartered for this. In fact, let's draw and quarter them right here and now.

There, that felt good, didn't it? Poor Ms. Hatcher did not deserve the hatchet job, she truly didn't. And these very selfsame critics liked Norbert Leo Butz. What are you going to do with critics like that? We've drawn and quartered them, perhaps we can make them eat a Spam sandwich. That would be a fine comeuppance, would it not? Because these Los Angeles critics need a comeuppance and also a comedownance in my humble opinion. And do you know what I did, dear readers? No, you don't, but I shall tell you because why should I keep you in the dark? I wrote Miss Teri Hatcher a letter and sent it to the Wilshire Theater on Wilshire Blvd., and I told her to ignore the critics and to keep on doing the splendid job she's doing. That is what I did, dear readers. Of course, she's probably sitting there trying to figure out who the hell The Real A is, but that is neither here nor there nor there nor here nor hither nor thither nor hence or whence. Oops, wait a minute, I'm just getting some e-mail. Let's see who it's from, shall we?

Date: Sat, March 3, 1999 19:50:00
To: The Real A (real@sondheim.com)
From: Teri Hatcher (thatcher@superbabe.com)

Dear The Real A:

How thoughtful of you to write me such a nice letter. I was very upset at these Los Angeles critics, I can tell you that. Not one of them mentioned how tall I am. I am the tallest Sally Bowles there has ever been. I am even taller than Natasha Richardson and Alan Cumming, although Alan Cumming doesn't play Sally Bowles. He'd like to, though. These critics seemed to have it in for me just because I played Lois Lane. Was that my fault? Did I cast me as Lois Lane? But at least the television critics mentioned how tall I was. I shall treasure your note and will keep it with me always. I shall even bring it on stage with me and show it to the other actors, especially Norbert Leo Butz, who now thinks he's a big cheese. Best of luck to you, whoever you are.

Sincerely,
Teri Hatcher

Wasn't that sweet of Teri Hatcher? And can you imagine that darned Norbert Leo Butz thinking he's a big cheese? Like that's a good thing? Norbert Leo Butz, giant Gouda. Real impressive. Here's something to ponder: Do you realize if they cast Joanna Going in the Broadway production of Cabaret the ads would read Cumming and Going. Just another useless bit of information which I happily provide to you, dear readers.

Art

Since the play Art is currently on view in Los Angeles and on Broadway, I thought this would be a fine opportunity to have a section of the column entitled Art. I have not seen said play, but I understand it somehow involves Art, as in painting, not Art as in a person's name. This section of the column will also be about Art as in painting and not as in a person's name. I just thought it would be fun to have show and tell with you, dear readers. So, first here is the famous J.C. Leyendecker painting which I purchased last year. This is not the famous faux Leyendecker, this is the real deal. This painting was used as the cover for the September 3rd, 1921 issue of The Saturday Evening Post. You will notice that the date on the painting says September 12. September 12, 1921 was "back to school" day, which is the subject of the painting. But because the issue came out on the 3rd, they changed the art (one of the few times in the Post's history). They dropped the date entirely, and moved the snail to the bottom left of the cover. It doesn't work nearly as well as the painting. Enough chatter, here it is.

Isn't that just splendid? Isn't that just the berries? Isn't that just too too? Mr. Leyendecker is one of the great illustration artists, and did over three hundred Post covers, as well as the famous Arrow Shirt Collar ads. He was the idol of Norman Rockwell, who is the only one who did more Post covers than Leyendecker. The next Art we have is by a gentleman named Schumacker. I don't know his work all that well, but he did many magazine illustrations and was quite well thought of. This painting is of "Sally", a little girl doing some Art of her own. After I purchased this, I got a nice e-mail from someone whose mother had known "Sally" who, as it turns out, was Schumacker's own daughter. This woman's mother used to babysit Sally. Sometimes the internet can be a wonderful place. Now, without further ado, here is "Sally", as painted by her father.

Isn't she the sweetest? Isn't she the berries? Isn't she just too too? In the coming weeks I'll share more of my Art collection with you, dear readers, because in so doing I feel we are having an Art moment. Perhaps we will even share a picture of an actual person named Art. Won't that be fun?

An Interesting Thing

Do you realize that if I was writing this here 77th column on the Sunset Strip that it would be 77 Sunset Strip? Isn't that an interesting bit of effluvia?

The Real A: A Life

I must have no life, dear readers, because despite having written a long and detailed A Life section this morning, Mr. Mark Bakalor tells me that it has disappeared, that it has gone the way of all flesh, whatever the hell that means. Yes, you heard it here, dear readers, an entire section of the column has gone missing. Vanished into thin air. Not fat air, mind you, oh no, this here section has vanished into thin air, which I frankly find more annoying. And because of the Way Things Work when I write any of this here column while sitting on my couch like so much fish, there is no way to "save" what I write. No, I send it, I get confirmation that it's been successfully sent, and that's it. Well, I wrote, I sent, I got confirmation, and yet, it did not arrive. It went into a void. We try to our darndest to avoid a void and yet a void is exactly what we haven't avoided. This is very frustrating, this losing of this section. I mean, we've lost A Life here. I think we should all take a moment and mourn our missing section. Now that we've mourned, what is the next step? I just can't be expected to write the whole thing over again. After all, I write these things off the top of my head (no mean feat) and I just can't be expected to do them again at the drop of a hat, now can I? All right, I just dropped a hat from off the top of my head and as I suspected, I can't be expected to write this whole thing over again. I was right, top-of-the-head and hat-wise. Oh, well, what can you do when this new-fangled technology runs amok. I had warned Mr. Bakalor that if this type of thing ever happened again (A Long Time Ago In A Column Far Away we'd lost quite a bit of a column which I'd had to reconstruct from scratch) that it would be the end of the column. Should I be an A of my word, dear readers? Or should we just spank the buttcheeks of Mr. Bakalor? I don't know. I just don't know. So, I'm afraid this will be our first "cliffhanger" column. Will next week be our final column? Was it all a dream? Stay tuned, dear readers. I know you will be waiting on pins and needles. Pins and needles? Don't you think that's just gilding the lily, whatever the hell that means?

Letters... We Get Letters

I wonder how many letters we're up to now. I wonder if we're getting close to another handy-dandy prize giveaway? Why, in the last three weeks alone I believe this column has received at least ten thousand letters, mostly "e"s and quite a few "i"s as well. Perhaps Mr. Mark Bakalor can tell us how many letters we're up to (Mr. Mark Bakalor, "1,499"). The bird is outside singing Jubilation T. Cornpone from Li'l Abner. What a jaunty tune, and the bird is doing it to a fare-thee-well, whatever the hell that is. I've always been very partial to Li'l Abner. Right around the time I was first being introduced to musical theater ("Rosalie, my darling") I saw the motion picture version of Li'l Abner, which was a very faithful recreation of the stage show. I loved every minute of it, saw it seventeen times in two weeks and wore out at least three copies of the soundtrack album. I used to do the choreography in our den. Why am I talking about Li'l Abner when I'm supposed to be answering letters? And just how do you answer a letter? For example, if the letter is "w" how do you answer it? "q"? Is that the answer? Oh, enough of this shillyshallying. I hate when people shillyshally, don't you? I don't mind it so much when they shallyshilly, but enough with the shillyshally already.

Evan will be directing Pippin at Queen's College in New York and he tells me that Stephen Schwartz has given him a new ending to the show. In this new ending does Pippin actually set himself aflame? Does he torch the duck? Or do he and the Leading Player go off together at the end of the show? Just asking.

Craig informs me that I did not answer his letter ("g") from last week. Perhaps I didn't get said letter as I do answer all that I receive, unless Craig merely sent in an answer to the trivia question. Craig is extremely frustrated with rehearsals for Into The Woods as his director is "beyond inept". I once went beyond inept but I didn't like it and I quickly returned to inept. Perhaps the director will find his way. Otherwise, my advice to Craig is this: The next time The Director From Beyond Inept gives you a direction that you find heinous (heinous , do you hear me?) merely say to him, "What is it, fish?". That will stop him in his tracks and he will most likely look at you askance.

Joe Obenberger, a first amendment lawyer in Chicago (the town, not the musical) paid a visit to this here column, and had a query. In addressing his query, he called me, The Real A, "Steve". Does he mean to imply that I am, in fact, my close personal friend, Mr. Stephen Sondheim? And would that mean that if I were Mr. Stephen Sondheim, that Mr. Stephen Sondheim would be me? While I can neither confirm nor deny said implication, I just throw out the following question: If it takes Mr. Stephen Sondheim three years to write Wise Guys, do you think he could finish a column a week? Just asking. Anyway, Joe's query has to do with a past column, in which I mentioned one-time Playmate Connie Kreski, who was in the film Can Hieronymous Merkin Ever Forget Mercy Humppe and Find True Happiness, playing opposite Mr. Anthony Newley. Joe was in the eighth grade when Ms. Kreski was a Centerfold and he was quite taken with her (as many were - including James Caan, who dated her for many years). Sadly, Joe has found out that Ms. Kreski has recently passed away. He'd like to know if there's any way I can arrange for him to see her film. Unfortunately, it's not available on video, so no, I can't. Since I mentioned in that long ago column that Ms. Kreski had ended up being a makeup person, Joe asks if I actually know that because I knew her. I will answer that question this way: I met her when she was performing her duties as a makeup person. I told her that I'd thought she was swell in Merkin and she seemed delighted that anyone remembered her at all. She worked in makeup for Playboy, by the way, on their photo and video shoots. Like or hate Mr. Hefner (Hef to his friends), he takes care of his own.

Erin feels that this here column is quirky. She asks if I plan said quirkiness or if said quirks just appear of their own volition. I find that this here column works best when I write it off the cuff. First of all, have you ever tried to write a column on the cuff? A cuff is much too small for this size column. I like to just go with the flow and sometimes even flow with the go. In other words, as Doris Day once sang "Que Sera Sera" or "Whatever Will Be Will Be".

Rafael wrote me a long dissertation on Buddha, things he learned from his tour guide Jackie in Bangkok. Apparently Rafael learned all about Buddha when he wasn't watching women shoot darts out of their genitalia.

Elan took exception to a line in last week's column, in which I stated "Teri Hatcher puts the songs over with great elan". Elan informs me that Ms. Hatcher has, in fact, never put anything over on him, great or otherwise.

annyrose hasn't written in two weeks because she's been in rehearsals for Carousel. It seems the show opens in two weeks and yet the choreographer has only choreographed about thirty seconds of dance. Since there has been only thirty seconds of dance choreographed then what has stopped annyrose from writing? Unless she is playing Billy Bigelow there is simply no excuse for not writing.

Anna has finished doing Edwin Drood and apparently the show went well, even the part where they pranced across the stage like horses. Perhaps Anna can lend some of that choreography to annyrose's Carousel, as they seem to be a little short on the dance. Anna also wants me to tell dear reader Sarah, that So Many People is published in the All Sondheim Vol.II music book, on page 105.

mrsmig has worn her special handy-dandy "what is it, fish?" t-shirt to rehearsals of Archy and Mehitabel and even though she's explained it, the people there just don't get it. There is only one thing to say to those people, and that is "What is it, fish?" and if they have the temerity to look at you askance, merely continue with "Is there sauce on it? I wouldn't eat it if there's sauce on it".

kokol writes to tell me she hasn't read this here column in months, but is happy to find it "as witty and refreshing as ever". I am glad that it is witty and refreshing and we simply must insist that kokol take no more hiatuses. Otherwise strange and exotic women may show up at her house with darts, and believe me, it's just better to read this here column, frankly.

I received three e-mails too late to answer, from new reader Joey, from our beloved Emily and from polecat. Never fear, I shall answer your letters next week. Do try to get your letters to me by Friday, otherwise I may not get to them in time for the next column.

Trivia and Other Useless Knowledge

Oh, you smartypants people. There is just no fooling you. You are just too smart for your pants. Many of you knew at least part of the answer to last week's question: Name the two people from the 1968 revival of West Side Story who would go on to act in major Sondheim shows on Broadway. The following people got at least half the question right: jon, Anita, Jed, crow, Carlton and Evan. And the answer: Victoria Mallory played Maria and Kurt Peterson Tony, and both went on to play in Follies, and Ms. Mallory also played Anne in A Little Night Music as well as appearing in several Sondheim evenings. Mr. Peterson also co-produced the first of what would become many Sondheim tributes - Sondheim: A Musical Tribute, which had the famous Scrabble cover art.

This week's trivia question: This one is so obscure I would venture to say that no one will get it (although you never cease to amaze me, dear readers). I mentioned the motion picture version of Li'l Abner earlier. The film starred Peter Palmer, Leslie Parrish and Stubby Kaye. In the film, which mostly takes place in Al Capp's wonderful Dogpatch, U.S.A. there is a brief cameo appearance by a very well-known celebrity. Name the celebrity. No cheating now.

Send all answers to me at real@sondheim.com or use the form below...

“I found [the Sondheim Celebration's Company] to be completely delightful. Almost all of the numbers excited and energized me, and most of the scenes were about as pitch-perfect as you can get. I just sat there with a big smile on my face the whole show.

Which is not to say that it is perfect...”
- popcornonmyknees

Explore the rest of the Finishing the Chat Community Forum

With three hand-held cameras, one major theatrical milestone and nearly nineteen hours of footage, this rare and intimate look with Original Cast Album - Company is a must for any Sondheim fan.

DVD: $26.96
VHS: $24.95

One of Sondheim's most beloved works is sure to be Sunday in the Park with George, available on DVD, video tape, and CD.

CD: $13.99
DVD: $25.49
VHS: $19.98

All Sondheim completists are sure to now own the first complete recording of The Frogs coupled with Evening Primrose. Do you?

CD: $18.97